The Last Bout of ‘03 – NVIDIA’s GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
by Derek Wilson on October 23, 2003 9:30 AM EST- Posted in
- GPUs
F1 Challenge '99-'02 Performance no AA/AF
Even though the NVIDIA card overtakes the ATI card, we are still having the same visual quality issues we've been complaining about in past articles.
F1 Challenge '99-'02 Performance 4xAA/8xAF
At this point, 4XAA/8xAF cause the 5700 Ultras performance to drop below that of ATI. The visual shakiness issue also magnifies itself when 4xAA/8xAF are enabled in this game. Unfortunately, I haven't seen this game being mentioned in the release notes.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
114 Comments
View All Comments
XPgeek - Tuesday, October 28, 2003 - link
Today I purchased this eVGA GF FX 5700 Ultra. i have no complaints of image quality. i am using the 52.16 betas, and Battlefiled 1942 and its XPacks run great, as do the rest of my games. The only issue i have is its length. in my case, the power connector nestles right up to one of my hard drives. but it does fit. barely.To re-itterate, this is a very nice card. no, i havent tested a 9600Pro / XT myself, but o well. no i dont work for AT or any other reviewing site. and no im not biased. i actually went to Best Buy to get a 9600 Pro, but saw the 5700U instead. so i wont get HL2 for free. o well, i'll just buy it when it comes out.
Anonymous User - Monday, October 27, 2003 - link
you misspelled comparing 110, doh! rofl you sux!Anonymous User - Monday, October 27, 2003 - link
106, if you read the review and don't get the impression that it's a rushed and shoddy job, well then you're just not a particularly smart or insightful person. which is ok, no one said you had to be. again, i'm camparing this to the old AT from 2,3,4 years ago. read some of the older reviews, and you'll see what i mean. or maybe you won't, whatever.Anonymous User - Monday, October 27, 2003 - link
that'd be earth 106. and you? thanks 108.Anonymous User - Monday, October 27, 2003 - link
#104 you mispelled the word fuck.Anonymous User - Monday, October 27, 2003 - link
...nvidia sucks.Anonymous User - Monday, October 27, 2003 - link
#104, you're officially an idiot. AT didn't spend "much time"? What planet are you living on.Anonymous User - Monday, October 27, 2003 - link
Firingsquad has a decent image quality article up today. You can draw your own conclusion from the screen shots.Anonymous User - Monday, October 27, 2003 - link
why does anandtech use these anonymous forums? it just encourages all of this nonsense. wtf are you yelling at eachother fanboy-this and fanboy-that? grow the fuk up.that said, i think anyone who has been a fan of AT (like myself) must be concerned with the recent nature of the graphics card reviews. i'm an owner of both nvidia and ati cards, and am too damn old to be a fanboy (maybe i'm a fanman). ATs recent reviews have been rubbish. I understand about trying to get info out in a timely fashion, but these reviews read like they were written the night before they were due (so to speak). i mean, if i were grading these as college papers or something, AT would get a D at best. i'm mostly comparing this to previous AT work, not other websites. i'm still an AT fan, i'm not goin anywhere.
for some reason, the problems seem to be with the graphic card reviews more than anythng else. maybe because this is the most competetive market, and they have to pump it out ASAP.. it just feels like they're not giving much time to their reviews.
the posters that have done the metrics on the review seem to have the right idea. specifically, it looks most like a tie to me, with 5700ultra being best in opengl situations, and 9600xt being best in other situations (ok, maybe that's not a tie :)
the "TKO" conclusion certainly is baffling.
Anonymous User - Sunday, October 26, 2003 - link
Stop acting like a fanboy #102, you look stupider by the second. Oh, and I'd like to see you try to keep my mouth shut. Ahhh, too bad, the little geek has no control over the situation. lol