2.8E vs 2.8C: DirectX 9 Gaming Performance
Again, in Direct X 9 games like Halo and Aquamark 3, Prescott is at least as good as Northwood in performance on the ATI chipset. It certainly appears that ATI is providing us good information here. RS350 is tweaked for Prescott and if you're also buying a new processor with a 9100 IGP PRO, you will be better off with a Prescott or "E" series CPU.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
24 Comments
View All Comments
araczynski - Monday, May 3, 2004 - link
Who that comes to this site give a flying f*ck about integrated graphics?? Whether you're comparing a Yugo GV or a Yugo GVX, ITS STILL A FRICKING YUGO!!!where are the x800 bencharks?? that's what we care about.
Regs - Monday, May 3, 2004 - link
To bad the 2.8 Prescott's are worthless considering how they hardly out shine their Northwood counter parts. But it's interesting to see how a Prescott tweaked mobo performed.Marsumane - Monday, May 3, 2004 - link
Integrated graphics that still suck!Although they are just like the comparison between the 9800xt and the 6800u. 2x as fast)
MAME - Monday, May 3, 2004 - link
nVidia -> King of AthlonXPsATI -> King of Prescotts