ATI X800 XT PCIe: nVidia nForce4 vs. ATI Bullhead

nVidia introduced nForce4 several weeks ago as their PCI Express updated version of the nForce chipset for Athlon 64. In nForce4: PCI Express and SLI for Athlon 64, we concluded the performance of nForce 4 and nForce3 Ultra was basically the same. However, with nForce4 sporting PCI Express graphics, we have the opportunity to compare the same PCIe video card directly on both systems. We first compared performance of the ATI X800 XT PCIe on both the ATI Bullhead Reference board and the nVidia nForce4 Reference board.

ATI X800 XT (PCIe), nVidia nForce4 vs. ATI Bullhead
FX55, 2X512MB, 2-2-2-10 DDR
Benchmark nVidia nForce4 ATI Bullhead
ATI RX480
% Change
nF4 to ATI
Halo 106.6 121.9 +14.4%
UT2004 - High Quality 74.0 74.4 +0.5%
Doom3 - High Quality 102.5 97.9 -4.5%
Far Cry 1.1 158.9 168.6 +6.1%
RTCW - Enemy Territory Radar 114.0 115.3 +1.1%

There are some very interesting results comparing ATI PCIe video on both systems. First, we see that Far Cry is still slower on nVidia, even with the ATI PCIe video card. This leads us to conclude that at least part of the performance hit that we see with Far Cry is a result of nVidia chipset or driver code. We see a similar anomaly in Doom 3 being slower with the ATI card on the ATI than it is with ATI on nVidia. Since everything else is the same in both setups, we again would look to ATI drivers or chipset code as the likely issue.

Halo is a significant 14.4% slower on nVidia/ATI than on ATI/ATI, but you will see in later benchmarks that nVidia PCIe on nVidia is roughly equivalent in performance to ATI PCIe on ATI. In the larger picture, this is a driver/code issue worth a look by manufacturers, but it doesn't reflect any real performance differences in these chipsets. Overall, the ATI Bullhead can be considered equivalent to a bit faster in performance than nForce 4 with both running an ATI PCIe video card. This is a remarkable accomplishment for the new ATI RX480/RS480 chipset compared to the more mature nVidia nForce4.

ATI X800 XT: MSI K8N Neo2 vs. ATI Bullhead nVidia 6800 Ultra PCIe: nVidia nForce4 vs. ATI Bullhead
Comments Locked

45 Comments

View All Comments

  • kogase - Monday, November 8, 2004 - link

    Eh... I don't think the boards are kicking Intel's ass. A64 is.
  • fuzzynavel - Monday, November 8, 2004 - link

    I didn't realise that the nforce4 and ATI mobos...kicked intels ass so badly!! Not bad for a first attempt....just avoid the integrated graphics and it all looks sweet
  • Denial - Monday, November 8, 2004 - link

    This is nice and all, but I'm not uprading until dual cores are out. The difference between my home PC (P4 2.8) and office workstation (dual 2.66 xeons) is night and day. It's at the point that my home PC drives me nuts when one process brings everything else to a halt (all the more frustrating when it's something like explorer running amok). I've absolutely had it with single CPU's, no more!
  • VaultDweller - Monday, November 8, 2004 - link

    The tables on pages 10 and 11 both list Halo as the first benchmark, but the review text on page 10 refers to a 14.4% gain in 'Quake 3.' According to the table, that 14.4% was for Halo.
  • MAME - Monday, November 8, 2004 - link

    sweet

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now