ATI's Multi-GPU Solution: CrossFire
by Anand Lal Shimpi & Derek Wilson on May 30, 2005 9:00 PM EST- Posted in
- GPUs
Performance
ATI outfitted three motherboard manufacturers with fully functional CrossFire demo systems to show off at the show. The systems featured an ATI CrossFire reference board and a pair of graphics cards: a Radeon X850 XT and a CrossFire Radeon X850 XT.The CrossFire X850 XT had a DVI dongle with two ports; one connected to the monitor, the second connected to a DVI cable, which was fed into the DVI output of the regular X850 XT card.
Even in CrossFire mode, the two graphics cards appear independently in device manager, which may allow for multi-monitor operation while in CrossFire mode:
Enabling CrossFire is done from within the ATI control panel, and unlike NVIDIA's SLI, no reboot is required:
With CrossFire enabled, the new AA modes are available for user selection:
Armed with one of these machines that ATI sent to their partners, we managed to get some benchmark time with CrossFire. Unfortunately, we didn't have much time to test nor did we have a full suite of benchmarks, so all we could run was Doom 3 (it was either Doom 3 or 3dmark 05).
The system that we used for testing featured an Athlon 64 FX-53, 512MB of memory and the two X850 XT graphics cards running under Windows XP Professional.
We ran all Doom 3 tests with 4X AA enabled at the High Quality presets in the unpatched retail version of Doom 3.
Even at this early stage, performance and stability were both impressive. The system that we were running had just been assembled hours earlier and didn't crash at all during our testing. In fact, the system was so new that the motherboard manufacturer who let us test with their hardware hadn't even seen it running - it was their first time as well as ours.
The performance of the solution was equally impressive; at 1024x768, the dual GPU CrossFire setup improved performance by 49%. At 1280x1024 and 1600x1200, the performance went up by 72% and 86% respectively. We had our doubts that ATI would be able to offer performance scaling on par with what we've seen on NVIDIA's SLI, but these initial numbers, despite being run on early hardware/drivers, are quite promising.
57 Comments
View All Comments
Bloodshedder - Monday, May 30, 2005 - link
Kind of makes me wonder about compatibility with All-in-Wonder cards.RadeonGuy - Monday, May 30, 2005 - link
why didnt you run it on a FX-55 and 1gig of memoryQuintin - Monday, May 30, 2005 - link
interesting....ksherman - Monday, May 30, 2005 - link
#6, Id love too, but I dont have the money right now and the cards are not availible...Brian23 - Monday, May 30, 2005 - link
#9, #10, and #11: That will never happen. The traces between the GPU and the memory need to be UBER short. The socket would increase trace lengths too much. Plus there is so many kinds of graphics memory with different bus widths.Waylay00 - Monday, May 30, 2005 - link
What would be better is a motherboard that has a built in GPU socket and you could buy the GPU's just like CPU's. Then there would be no need for video cards, but rather just video RAM and the GPU core.Waylay00 - Monday, May 30, 2005 - link
UNCjigga - Monday, May 30, 2005 - link
What I really want is a graphics card with extra sockets for a 2nd GPU and more RAM. So I can start with one board with a single GPU and 256MB RAM, then I can upgrade either the existing GPU with a faster one, and/or upgrade the RAM from 256MB to 512MB, and/or slap a second GPU into the extra socket and effectively double performance. That would rock.arfan - Monday, May 30, 2005 - link
Good Job ATIbob661 - Monday, May 30, 2005 - link
I wonder what the REAL price will be on the Crossfire cards.