ATI Radeon X800 GT: A Quality Mid-range Solution
by Josh Venning on September 28, 2005 12:05 AM EST- Posted in
- GPUs
Everquest II Performance
Here now is a game where the X800 GT really shines. Granted, the framerates are all rather low (besides the X800 XT); however, EQ2 is an RPG and doesn't require 60+ FPS. We'd say that 30 FPS is what you should look for in EQ2 for a playable experience.
Keep in mind that Everquest 2 probably takes the win in our opinion as the most demanding game out right now in terms of graphics requirements. Also, there are different overall quality settings in the game options such as "ultra-high", "very-high", etc. and we ran these tests on the "very-high" setting. With the quality setting turned down a notch or two, the game runs very smoothly, and if EQ2 is your game of choice, you will likely be pleased by the performance that the X800 GT has to offer. You might also consider dropping to 1024x768 for EQ2 - provided that you're not using an LCD, that is.
Here now is a game where the X800 GT really shines. Granted, the framerates are all rather low (besides the X800 XT); however, EQ2 is an RPG and doesn't require 60+ FPS. We'd say that 30 FPS is what you should look for in EQ2 for a playable experience.
Relative to the other similarly priced cards, the X800 GT does very well here. It's the only one to break the 30 FPS mark at any of the tested resolutions, ignoring the higher cost X800 XT. While we'd even go so far as to say that all of the cards can handle 1280x1024 without AA, higher resolutions and the use of 4xAA drop performance to unacceptable levels.
Keep in mind that Everquest 2 probably takes the win in our opinion as the most demanding game out right now in terms of graphics requirements. Also, there are different overall quality settings in the game options such as "ultra-high", "very-high", etc. and we ran these tests on the "very-high" setting. With the quality setting turned down a notch or two, the game runs very smoothly, and if EQ2 is your game of choice, you will likely be pleased by the performance that the X800 GT has to offer. You might also consider dropping to 1024x768 for EQ2 - provided that you're not using an LCD, that is.
48 Comments
View All Comments
JarredWalton - Wednesday, September 28, 2005 - link
It's okay, Paul - we know how names with the first letter can get mixed up. ;)A few of the paragraphs are mine, but I doubt anyone would be able to pick them out. LOL. It's like "Where's Waldo": where's the paragraph written by a different editor?
ViRGE - Wednesday, September 28, 2005 - link
It went up nearly 2 days ago then disappeared, and now it's finally back up. What happened?DerekWilson - Wednesday, September 28, 2005 - link
Technical difficulties :-)We worked it out though
overclockingoodness - Wednesday, September 28, 2005 - link
Whenever you see an article disappear like that, just know that they published it accidently. Although I must say, you guys have been having technical difficulties for quite a bit lately.I probably wouldn't mind if the ATI R520 article went up early due to technical difficulties. ;)
DerekWilson - Wednesday, September 28, 2005 - link
hehe ... If we could possibly get it done early, that might be a problem :-) But we'll be working hard and late on that one.rqle - Wednesday, September 28, 2005 - link
On the Power Consumption page, is that the WHOLE system power draw (cpu, hd, video card, ram, board) or is it just then Video card?rqle - Wednesday, September 28, 2005 - link
nvm, didnt read it clear the first way throughnourdmrolNMT1 - Wednesday, September 28, 2005 - link
my 9800 pro is seriously taking a beating.maybe this christmas ill get a whole new inside. since upgrading my gpu means upgrading my mobo too.
hmm
ShadowVlican - Wednesday, September 28, 2005 - link
oh man.. these cards are supposed to cater to different price points, but now there's so many cards that it makes it even more confusing to buy... i'll stick with 6600GT because of purevideo (next pc = htpc)Jep4444 - Wednesday, September 28, 2005 - link
ATIs next generation cards are supposedly one upping nVidia with Pure Video with H.264 encoding and while your at it, you may want to look into the whole Avivo thing since it seems to be up your alley(although i guess alot of it is marketing, im just referring to the concept in general)that aside i don't know why you recomend the X800XT to those needing to play at those settings at all completely ignoring the X800XL which at times has reached price levels below $250