AT Exclusive Preview: The GeForce 7800 GS Hits the Scene
by Derek Wilson & Kristopher Kubicki on November 22, 2005 8:00 PM EST- Posted in
- GPUs
Battlefield 2 Performance
Under Battlefield 2 the 7800 GS falls right between the 6800 GS and the 7800 GT. At 1600x1200 the X1800 XL performs about 8.3% better than the 7800 GS, though with a solid 44.8 fps it is very playable.
With 4xAA the 7800 GS remains playable up to 1600x1200. It is also only 1.1 frames per second behind the X1800 XL. The added power of the 7800 GS does give gamers a little more flexibility than with the 6800 GS when it comes to antialiasing.
Under Battlefield 2 the 7800 GS falls right between the 6800 GS and the 7800 GT. At 1600x1200 the X1800 XL performs about 8.3% better than the 7800 GS, though with a solid 44.8 fps it is very playable.
With 4xAA the 7800 GS remains playable up to 1600x1200. It is also only 1.1 frames per second behind the X1800 XL. The added power of the 7800 GS does give gamers a little more flexibility than with the 6800 GS when it comes to antialiasing.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
43 Comments
View All Comments
nserra - Wednesday, November 23, 2005 - link
the 7800GTX512 is the card to buy because it's much faster than the others. ;)I want one but with 256MB memory, and less than 399$. Call it 7800GTX256 i dont care.
What happen to the Ultra (naming), doesnt sound good?
coldpower27 - Wednesday, November 23, 2005 - link
Your basically dreaming here, since the MSRP of the 7800 GTX 256 is 499US now, best we could hope for is GTX 256 Rev.2 at MSRP 549US.lexmark - Wednesday, November 23, 2005 - link
Could you guy possibly replace doom3 benchmarks with CoD2? The game is growing cobwebs now! :) Quake 4 should account for doom3 since its built with an optimized doom3 engine.KHysiek - Wednesday, November 23, 2005 - link
I think it needs a bit faster memory on release version. Something like 1.2GHz would be nice.coldpower27 - Wednesday, November 23, 2005 - link
The problem is both a lower product and a higher product, have the exact same memory bandwidth of 32GB/s, so it doens't look like they have much flexibility with the bandwidth. Unless you want to pull an ATI, and have memory bandwidth at different levels, across the entire line like X800 Series.Wesleyrpg - Wednesday, November 23, 2005 - link
I'm a bang for your buck sorta guy. Seems like its going to be a great card should it ever get released!How about the important stuff, does it overclock well, and how aboout those estra pipelines, are they unlockable?
DerekWilson - Wednesday, November 23, 2005 - link
Its a tough sell to even claim that the 7800 GS will ship with this pipeline and clock speed configuration, let alone to say that retail units will function similarly to this random early sample we happened to get our hands on.Up to 8 pipelines could be unlocked on this unit with RivaTuner, but if NVIDIA starts building G70 based silicon with only 16 pipes that capability could go away. And just becuase something can be unlocked doesn't mean it will work.
Finding out how overclockable this part will be is a big reason we want to see this card make it to market.
gibhunter - Wednesday, November 23, 2005 - link
Fine, since I've been a reader of AT for about 7 years (this is the first PC enthusiast site I visit every day) I'll give you guys a benefit of the doubt.Next time you write an article about an unanounced card, try not to sound so defensive. It makes you look guilty.
DerekWilson - Wednesday, November 23, 2005 - link
I didn't defend anything :-)My opinion on the subject is that the truth doesn't change if someone decides to believe a something else. And if you can't take us at our word in our articles then there's nothing I can say that will change your mind in our comments.
I would hope that our track record has proven us to be trustworthy and plain spoken with our readers. But that doesn't mean I want people to stop questioning us and keeping us honest.
Paratus - Tuesday, November 22, 2005 - link
Are any of these tested with AF?