Audio Performance

We limited audio testing to the Rightmark 3D Sound version 2.2 CPU utilization test and tested with sound enabled to show the performance effects on several games. The Rightmark 3D Sound benchmark measures the overhead or CPU utilization required by a codec or hardware audio chip.

The Realtek ALC-882D HD audio codec was tested with the recently released 1.31 driver set. The Realtek DirectSound audio drivers do not support more than 32 hardware buffers and the OpenAL 1.1 drivers do not support more than 30 hardware buffers at this time, so the scores cannot be directly compared to the HDA Mystique 7.1 and Creative Labs Sound Blaster X-FI cards in the benchmarks. The Realtek OpenAL 1.1 driver increases CPU utilization up to 21% more than the Realtek DirectSound drivers in the 3D tests.

Audio Performance - Empty CPU - 32 Buffers

Audio Performance - 2d Audio - 32 Buffers

Audio Performance - DirectSound 3D HW - 32 Buffers

Audio Performance - DirectSound 3D EAX2 - 32 Buffers

The Realtek ALC-882 HD audio codec generates acceptable CPU utilization rates with reductions of up to 28% in the 3D EAX test compared to the previous driver release. The HDA Mystique 7.1 Gold has the highest overall utilization rates of the audio solutions tested. The Realtek ALC-882D performance is equal to the ALC-850 (driver set 3.82) and offers significantly better audio quality. The Sound Blaster X-FI has the lowest overall rates as expected. Let's find out how these results translate into real world numbers.

Game Audio Performance - Serious Sam II - Branchester Demo

Game Audio Performance - Splinter Cell Chaos Theory

Game Audio Performance - BattleField 2

Game Audio Performance - Call of Duty II - Demo 5

Game Audio Performance - F.E.A.R. - Performance Test

The audio performance numbers remain consistent as the Realtek ALC-882D finishes behind the HDA Mystique 7.1 and SoundBlaster X-FI in several benchmarks. Serious Sam II suffers a loss of 45%, Splinter Cell at 2%, Battlefield 2 at 21%, Call of Duty 2 at 4%, and F.E.A.R. at 2%. The output quality of audio with the Realtek ALC-822D is probably the best of the on-board audio solutions that we have heard and continues to improve with each driver release. The vast majority of users should have no issues utilizing the ALC-882D as their primary audio solution, considering the overall quality of audio and performance at this time.

However, if you are a serious gamer, then a dedicated sound card is still a requirement to ensure consistent frame rate averages across a wide variety of games. We noticed in previous testing of our Battlefield 2 and Half Life 2 benchmarks, the Realtek HD audio codec would cause stuttering in intensive scenes. The 1.31 driver release has now eliminated all stuttering in our current benchmarks while improving performance across the board except in Serious Sam II. We did not notice the same performance degradation in Serious Sam II with the 1.31 driver set and the Realtek ALC-882 codec on the Intel chipset boards. We are still investigating this issue.

Ethernet Performance Final Words
Comments Locked

42 Comments

View All Comments

  • Gary Key - Friday, March 10, 2006 - link

    quote:

    I wonder why the review of "the older/ now economy" Abit ATI 200 chipset for crossfire board, especially since it is known to have some problems (the chipset and microcode)?


    Abit plans on this board becoming a value performance leader with the AT8-32x being slightly more upscale in the price range. We will be reviewing this board once it is available. However, given the current price range of the RD580 boards, the RD480 boards are the better value at this time given the incremental performance differences of the RD580 (although this would be my personal choice).

    There have been some growing pains with the ATI chipsets but there were also growing pains with the NVIDIA/SIS/VIA/ULi/ALI/Intel/etc. chipsets at product launches also. :) Overall, both the ATI RD480 and RD580 are very good chipsets, the fact the SB600 Southbridge was not available in time for either product launch is where I think ATI failed. This forced the board suppliers to utilize a Southbridge solution (ULi M1575) that was not designed in conjunction with the RD480/580 Northbridge. While it is an excellent Southbridge solution, some of the storage access and timing issues that have been reported and now solved, were not seen on the few SB450 equipped boards. I personally expect the ATI equipped boards to mature quickly and provide an excellent competitive alternative to the nForce boards. This is good for all of us.
  • n7 - Friday, March 10, 2006 - link

    Even with the OCing issues, this is still a far better value Crossfire choice for anyone than the craptastic A8R-MVP

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now