Fall '06 NVIDIA GPU Refresh - Part I: GeForce 7900 GS
by Derek Wilson on September 6, 2006 9:00 AM EST- Posted in
- GPUs
Battlefield 2 Performance
This benchmark is performed using DICE's built in demo playback functionality with a few added extras built in house. When using the built in demo playback features of BF2, frames rendered during the loading screen are counted in the benchmark. In order to get a real idea of performance, we use the instantaneous frametime and frames per second data generated from a benchmark run. We discard the data collected during the loading screen and calculate a result that represents the actual gameplay that was benchmarked. While DICE maintains that results over 100fps aren't reliable, our methods have allowed us to get useful data from high performing systems.
During the benchmark, the camera switches between players and vehicles in order to capture the most action possible. There is a lot of smoke and explosions, so this is a very GPU intensive Battlefield 2 benchmark. The game itself is best experienced with average in-game framerates of 35 and up.
We ran Battlefield 2 using the highest quality graphics settings we could. Shadows, lighting, and especially view distance are very important in order to best play the game. In our opinion view distance should never be set to less than the max, but other settings can be decreased slightly if a little more performance or a higher resolution is required.
For a little less money, the overclocked 7900 GS delivers a little more performance than the X1900 GT under Battlefield 2. It seems like the X1900 GT may have a CPU limited advantage here, but at higher resolutions the XFX 7900 GS can deliver about 6% higher performance under the highest settings (without AA) for slightly less money. The X1900 GT is more competitive with the stock 7900 GS, but the advantage NVIDIA has in this case is in value.
Battlefield 2 Performance - No AA | |||||
800x600 |
1024x768 |
1280x1024 |
1600x1200 |
1920x1440 |
|
ATI Radeon X800 GTO | 63.9 |
48.2 |
34.3 |
25.8 |
18.6 |
ATI Radeon X1600 XT | 72.9 |
55.4 |
39.1 |
28.6 |
20.1 |
ATI Radeon X1800 GTO | 107.1 |
83.9 |
61.1 |
45.8 |
32.5 |
ATI Radeon X1900 GT | 134 |
111.1 |
84.3 |
65.7 |
50.2 |
ATI Radeon X1900 XT 256MB | 130.1 |
127.5 |
106.6 |
85.5 |
66.9 |
ATI Radeon X1900 XT | 142.4 |
139.2 |
115.4 |
92.4 |
72.7 |
NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT | 57.7 |
46.5 |
34.6 |
26.4 |
18.7 |
NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GS | 78.6 |
63.6 |
47.3 |
36.9 |
25.9 |
NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GT | 108 |
86.3 |
64.3 |
49.3 |
38.2 |
NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT | 117.2 |
96.8 |
74.4 |
57.4 |
45.2 |
NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GS | 125.4 |
105.9 |
81.8 |
63.9 |
50.2 |
XFX GeForce 7900 GS 480M Extreme | 128.4 |
112.7 |
87.1 |
67.7 |
53.3 |
NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GT | 134.2 |
116.6 |
91.2 |
71.8 |
57 |
With AA enabled, the X1900 GT closes the gap on the overclocked 7900 GS and outperforms the stock version. When all is said and done, the XFX 480M offers performance and value at least at the level of the X1900 GT in BF2. For those who wish to save the extra $20, the performance hit for not choosing the overclocked model is not huge. Which is the better deal will have to come down to personal preference and/or finance.
Battlefield 2 Performance - 4X AA | |||||
800x600 |
1024x768 |
1280x1024 |
1600x1200 |
1920x1440 |
|
ATI Radeon X800 GTO | 53.4 |
40.1 |
28.3 |
20.9 |
14.6 |
ATI Radeon X1600 XT | 61.8 |
45.9 |
32.3 |
21.4 |
14.1 |
ATI Radeon X1800 GTO | 92.2 |
70.4 |
50.6 |
37.5 |
26.1 |
ATI Radeon X1900 GT | 116.6 |
91.4 |
67.2 |
51 |
36.8 |
ATI Radeon X1900 XT 256MB | 128.2 |
117.2 |
89.4 |
70 |
52.6 |
ATI Radeon X1900 XT | 139.2 |
126.5 |
97.3 |
76.4 |
59.4 |
NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT | 46.1 |
35.2 |
25 |
16.4 |
|
NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GS | 67.2 |
52.7 |
38.3 |
29 |
19.6 |
NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GT | 86.4 |
66.2 |
47.3 |
35.2 |
24.1 |
NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT | 97.9 |
77 |
56.7 |
42.7 |
31.2 |
NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GS | 108.9 |
86.2 |
63.7 |
48.2 |
35.5 |
XFX GeForce 7900 GS 480M Extreme | 115.6 |
91.7 |
67.6 |
51.2 |
37.7 |
NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GT | 116.3 |
93.3 |
69.4 |
52.7 |
38.7 |
29 Comments
View All Comments
sirfergy - Wednesday, September 6, 2006 - link
Woot had this card for $139 a few weeks ago. So glad I jumped!artifex - Thursday, September 7, 2006 - link
I wish I'd bought 3 and sold them on eBay. Instead, I bought 0. :(http://www.woot.com/blog/BlogEntry.aspx?BlogEntryI...">woot entry
Spoelie - Wednesday, September 6, 2006 - link
I dunno the situation in the US, but Europe is seeing an interesting war. We have 7900GT's costing 230€, right above there is the X1900XT 256mb at 244€ and the X1900XT 512mb at 280€, with the overclocked 7900GT's overlapping in price with the X1900XT's.Check it on www.alternate.de for example.
At these prices, the X1900XT's are a pretty sweet deal, and warrant the little extra money paid over the 7900GT imho.
Spoelie - Wednesday, September 6, 2006 - link
just to be clear, those are the minimum prices found, in general you have about price parity between the GT's and XT 256mb, with a few superclocked cards costing as much or more as the XT 512mb...Incredible value in the 200-300€/$ range imho, with cards that just months ago were in the 300-500€/$ range
Spacecomber - Wednesday, September 6, 2006 - link
The concluding paragraphs on pages 4 and 5 are identical (i.e., the proper paragraph is missing for the XFX 480M Extreme vs. Stock Performance section).DerekWilson - Wednesday, September 6, 2006 - link
thanks, fixedSpoelie - Wednesday, September 6, 2006 - link
there's also a layout error in the table on page 9TheLiberalTruth - Wednesday, September 6, 2006 - link
I don't know if it's just me or what, but I can't get any page from this article after 1 to load. :\peldor - Wednesday, September 6, 2006 - link
The BFG 7600GT is down to $115 after rebate at Newegg.