ATI Radeon X1950 Pro: CrossFire Done Right
by Derek Wilson on October 17, 2006 6:22 AM EST- Posted in
- GPUs
Black & White 2 Performance
The AnandTech benchmark for Black & White 2 is a FRAPS benchmark. Between
the very first tutorial land and the second land there is a pretty well
rounded cut scene rendered in-game. This benchmark is indicative of real world
performance in Black & White 2. We are able to see many of the commonly
rendered objects in action. The most stressful part of the benchmark is a
scene where hundreds of soldiers come running over a hill, which really pounds
the geometry capabilities of these cards. At launch, ATI cards were severely
outmatched when it came to B&W2 performance because of this scene, but two
patches applied to the game and quite a few Catalyst revisions later give ATI
cards a much needed boost in performance over what we first saw.
A desirable average framerate for Black & White 2 is anything over 20 fps.
The game does remain playable down to the 17-19 fps range, but we usually
start seeing the occasional annoying hiccup during gameplay here. While this
isn't always a problem as far as getting things done and playing the game, any
jerkiness in frame rate degrades the overall experience.
We did test with all the options on the highest quality settings under the
custom menu. Antialiasing has quite a high performance hit in this game, and
is generally not worth it at high resolutions unless the game is running on a
super powerhouse of a graphics card. If you're the kind of person who just
must have AA enabled, you'll have to settle for a little bit lower resolution
than we tend to like on reasonably priced graphics cards. Black & White 2
is almost not worth playing at low resolutions without AA, depth of field, or
bloom enabled. At that point, we tend to get image quality that resembles the
original Black & White. While various people believe that the original was
a better game, no one doubts the superiority of B&W2's amazing
graphics.
As with Battlefield 2, we see performance on par with the 7900 GT. In this case, the X1950 Pro actually equals the performance of the X1900 XT 256MB. It seems like either geometry or memory (or both) are the major factors in performance here. Again, CrossFire offers a good boost over single card performance exceeding the high end single card solutions from both manufacturers, but 7900 GS SLI still comes back from behind in the singe card race to beat CrossFire.
45 Comments
View All Comments
Spoelie - Tuesday, October 17, 2006 - link
Bit disappointed, was hoping for 600/700 clocks. I'm curious about the temperatures under load and if it would easily overclock to at least those speeds. And what about HDCP? But I guess we'll have to wait for retail cards.If the price is €200 or less I just might be getting one to replace my x800xt :)
Spoelie - Tuesday, October 17, 2006 - link
Apparantly, powercolor clocks all its x1950pro cards up to 600/700 and have a 512mb sku. Plus silent cooling :)http://www.powercolor.com/global/main_product_seri...">http://www.powercolor.com/global/main_product_seri...
No word on hdcp and price tho :/
DerekWilson - Tuesday, October 17, 2006 - link
HDCP support is optional for vendors, but it seems like ATI is heavily encouraging them to include HDCP on all 1950 PRO cards. Since it's not guaranteed, be sure to check the specifications before you purchase.The power color 1950 PRO is not passively cooled but it includes a low dB fan. It does look like an interesting product, and we intend to acquire one for further investigation.
Goty - Tuesday, October 17, 2006 - link
Go read the review over at bit-tech. They've got prices up and the Saphire card they reviewed has HDCP.MadBadger - Tuesday, October 17, 2006 - link
Thanks for the review :beer;An observation:
-the pricefinder at the top of the article seems a bit out of whack. It shows as x1950 512 mb (PCI), but it links to the 1950 pro 256 mb for amazon and to the x1950 xt for the others.