AMD's Phenom X3 8000 Series: Fighting Two Cores with Three?
by Anand Lal Shimpi on April 23, 2008 9:00 AM EST- Posted in
- CPUs
High Definition Media Encoding
DivX 6.8 with Xmpeg
Our DivX test is the same one we've run in our regular CPU reviews, we're simply encoding a 1080p MPEG-2 file in DivX. We are using an unconstrained profile and enhanced multithreading is enabled.
DivX encoding performance hasn't really been a strongpoint of Phenom and what's even more disappointing here is that despite having an additional core and higher IPC, the Phenom X3's clocks are so low that the older Athlon X2s are able to come within striking distance. Only the 8650 and 8750 are clocked high enough to actually separate themselves from the faster Athlon X2s.
That being said, the Core 2 Duo E4700 manages to outperform all of the X3 lineup at a price lower than all.
Windows Media Encoder 9
Using Windows Media Encoder's advanced video profile we encode a 500MB AVI file, this is the same test we've run in other CPU reviews.
Windows Media Encoder is actually hardcoded to only support powers of two number of cores and thus we see no benefit to the third core in this test. There are a few applications where triple-core will run into this sort of an issue and there's simply no workaround until the ISV, in this case Microsoft, updates the application itself.
Based on how competitive the Phenom X4 9750 is here, we'd expect a fairly good showing from the Phenom X3 if all three cores were operational but since they aren't the performance is around the level of a Core 2 Duo E4700.
x264 Encoding with AutoMKV
Using AutoMKV we compress the same source file we used in our WME test down to 100MB, but with the x264 codec. We used the 2-pass Balanced encoding profile.
Our x264 encoding test shows the Phenom X3 actually slightly outperforming Intel's similarly priced dual-core offerings, the race is very close here.
45 Comments
View All Comments
Anand Lal Shimpi - Wednesday, April 23, 2008 - link
The problem is without support in 100% of the titles it's not something you can really count on. If you go with too slow of a CPU, hoping to rely on GPU acceleration but then try and play a rip that isn't accelerated you're just out of luck.Regardless, I'm just waiting for the day when all platforms feature GPU acceleration :)
Take care,
Anand
ViRGE - Wednesday, April 23, 2008 - link
"Now if you pirate your HD movies then none of this matters, as GPU accelerated H.264 decode doesn't work on much pirated content."Sure it does, the Cyberlink H.264/MPEG-2 decoder is a complete DirectShow-compliant module. Anything H.264 that can be played in a DirectShow application is accelerated by it, both legit and pirated content.
0roo0roo - Thursday, April 24, 2008 - link
it doesn't matter either way. pirated h264 content tends to be lower bitrate versions of the full hd rip.even at full bitrate it doesn't matter as processors have come to a point where even budget dual cores can decode h264 quite well.
ChronoReverse - Wednesday, April 23, 2008 - link
And on the free software side, Media Player Classic Home Cinema (what a mouthful) also has GPU accelerated decode now too (only for the newer video cards though).While not all pirate content are encoded in a manner that can be accelerated, the functionality is available now.