Full-Frame DSLRs

Just over a year ago we were predicting that the professional DSLR market would likely move completely to the full-size digital sensor. The speed with which this has actually happened is pretty impressive. A little over a year ago only Canon played alone in the full-frame arena, and their top selling full-frame pro model, the 1DS Mark II, was selling for $8000. Now just over a year later the top three camera manufacturers - Canon, Nikon, and Sony - all have full-frame offerings, and all of them have full-frame models that sell for $3000 or less.


Since acquiring Minolta, Sony has been aiming for more respect in the camera industry. A key part of that strategy was the launch of a full-frame Sony DSLR, which finally happened in the last couple of months. The new Sony A900 is not just another offering either, but a new full-frame solution. First, it features the highest resolution full-frame sensor you can buy with the 24.6MP Sony sensor. Pundits said Sony couldn't make a full-frame with Image Stabilization in the body, but that is exactly what they did. Steady Shot works great and makes any of the multitude of Sony and Minolta lenses that mount on the A900 image stabilized.

There is also the viewfinder. If anyone doubted Sony in the optics department they have only to look through the 100% view of the A900 viewfinder to be reminded again what optics and full-frame are all about. In fact, the Sony viewfinder is clearly the best, biggest, and brightest you will find in any current DSLR.

The A900 is not without its issues, however. 24.6MP is an incredible amount of detail, but noise starts to become a problem at ISO 1600. Everyone would like to see lower noise at the higher ISOs, but the detail captured at the highest ISOs, even with higher noise, is still very impressive. Sony has a huge lens lineup, mostly brought over direct form Minolta, but many of these designs could use a refresh. Also in terms of continuous speed, Sony, with all their mirror innovations like parallel link, still falls in the middle at 5 FPS between the super-high speed 9 FPS D3 and the new 3.5 FPS Canon 5D Mark II.


The Nikon D700 is the new cheaper Nikon full-frame designed to compete with the Sony A900 and the Canon 5D Mark II. When it launched just a few months ago it had no real peers, but now that the 24.6MP Sony A900 is shipping and the Canon 5D Mark II is 21.1MP, the Nikon line is starting to look like a new full-frame should be on the way. Nothing we have tested rivals the incredible low noise of the Nikon sensor, and D700 speed with the right battery is a blistering 8 FPS.


On paper, the Canon 5D Mark II looks like the one to beat in this category. After all Canon was first to offer a full-frame at the low price of around $3000 over three years ago, and Canon themselves proclaim the new 5D Mark II sensor the most advanced they make - better even than the $8000 1Ds Mark III. After the 50D failed to impress as completely as many expected of a 15.1MP Canon, most are waiting until the 5D Mark II production models start landing next week to decide how good they are.

The 5D Mark II updates everything to the very latest thinking in digital technology, including the two Live View modes, and a new twist that will likely be just the beginning of a revolution in the DSLR market. The Canon 5D Mark II also features a true 1080i HD movie mode that is pretty impressive in the early samples Canon has released. This true HD movie capability also auto-focuses. 21.1MP on a full-frame sensor means much bigger pixels than 15.1MP on a 1.6X crop sensor, so high hopes abound. Canon had the guts to include 25600 as an ISO speed option on the new 5D, matching the Nikon D3 and D700 in top ISO speed. If it is close to as good as the Nikon full-frames at high ISO it will not be long until you will see a Nikon D3x. You can be sure a Canon 1Ds Mark IV is also on its way early next year.

It is impossible to make a recommendation in the full-frame category because each camera in the group excels in different areas, and the decision will be based on your needs and the lens system you now use or choose. The Sony delivers the highest resolution any reviewer has ever tested, speed is good, and the viewfinder is the best. Ergonomics and ease-of-use are superb, but it is weak in high ISO noise at this point - which possibly will be much improved (as in the A700) with future firmware updates. The Nikons have the best High ISO performance and speed, but with half the resolution of the Sony A900. Still, for action or sports nothing comes close to the speed of the Nikon full-frames. The Canon 5D Mark II is the slowest of the group on continuous speed, but resolution may come close to the Sony and high ISO performance could be equal or near the Nikon full-frames.

We will soon have more answers to the question of which full-frame is "best", but the market niches that each of these three target will still likely make them three very different solutions for the full-frame market.

Prosumer Picks Things to Consider
Comments Locked

41 Comments

View All Comments

  • gaston1 - Friday, November 28, 2008 - link

    I totally agree about the Pentax part. How can one mention Canon 40d and 50d and totally miss to mention the 14.6 Megapixel K20D which is currently selling for less than $750 and is actually loaded with pro features!
  • DragonzFx - Thursday, November 27, 2008 - link

    I own a Fuji S100FS and for the price I paid ($720cdn tax incl). That
    is a lot of camera for the money in my opinion. It would have been nice to see this camera reviewed in your article as it is a great bridge camera. It is so feature rich and gives you the equivalent of a camera having anywhere from 35mm equivalent of 50mm Wide Angle all the way up to400mm Telephoto due to the 14x optical zoom. You can shoot fully manual or auto. In Jpeg or Raw, this camera does it all without the need to change a lense. And it uses a Li-on battery not AA's lol. Just my 2cents
  • Johnmcl7 - Thursday, November 27, 2008 - link

    "If you are an Olympus fan, you will need to wait for a couple of months. Olympus has announced the new 12MP E30 that brings most of the great E1 features, including its super fast AF module, down to a lower prosumer price point."

    I assume you're referring to the E-3 rather than the E-1 and it's geriatric AF.

    John
  • Wesley Fink - Thursday, November 27, 2008 - link

    Yes, you correctly point out the E-3 is the Zippy AF master with 11 double-croos AF points (44 segments). I have corrected the typo.
  • Dennis Travis - Thursday, November 27, 2008 - link

    I just purchased the Canon A590 IS because I did not have a lot of $$$. It totally blows away my way more expensive Digi. It's an amazing little camera for the price and in spite of the price also. I took it to the opening of the Apple Store in my city and every picture was first rate and even though it was very crowded in there and I was in a hurry to get some shots, the IS did it's job. Not one bad pic in the lot and I took over 100.

    So many great features also with both aperture and Shutter Priority which is amazing at that price point. Canon did an excellent job with the A590 IS. I highly recommend it to anyone on a budget that wants a lot of control over your pictures.
  • brokensoul - Thursday, November 27, 2008 - link

    No word of DxOMark ? new website, quite handy to judge pure Raw quality of sensors, but it could do with some explanations.. :-P
    Nice work though, quite a broad coverage of the camera market
  • dani31 - Thursday, November 27, 2008 - link

    Where is Panasonic DMC-LX3, probably the best compact in the world?
  • zzzxtreme - Monday, December 1, 2008 - link

    I agree, Panasonic DMC-LX3 is one of the best compact. It is what reviewers claim, almost like a $5000 Leica compact.
  • Wesley Fink - Thursday, November 27, 2008 - link

    We do agree the DMC-LX3 is a terrific Point-and-Shoot, but at $500 it is more than we can justify for a compact in today's market. As we stated in the review it is very hard to justify spending more than $250 to $300 in today's market with DSLR's starting at $400.

    The Panasonic G1 interchangeable lens large sensor - which was selected as the best entry large-sensor - is significantly better and more flexible than the LX3. With some selling it for $649 and special promotions getting the price below $500 in some cases the G1 is the camera we sould buy in this price class - or the Sony A200 2-lens kit or the Canon XS kit.
  • PrinceGaz - Thursday, November 27, 2008 - link

    If you've got $500 to spend on a camera, and it's a choice between a quality compact you can slip into your pocket for everyday use, or an SLR which will normally be left at home, I'd spend the $500 on a compact.

    Whilst the SLR can no doubt take better pictures, that's of no value whatsoever unless you actually have it with you. The SLR won't be taking any pictures when it was left at home, while the compact is always ready to be used at a moments notice.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now