The SSD Anthology: Understanding SSDs and New Drives from OCZ
by Anand Lal Shimpi on March 18, 2009 12:00 AM EST- Posted in
- Storage
SSD Aging: Read Speed is Largely Unaffected
Given the nature of the SSD performance-over-time “problem” you’d expect to only pay the performance penalty when writing files, not reading. And for once, I don’t have any weird exceptions to talk about - this is generally the case.
The table below shows sequential read performance for 2MB blocks on new vs. “used” SSDs. I even included data for a couple of the hard drives in the "Used" column; for those numbers I'm simply measuring transfer rates from the slowest parts of the platter:
| 2MB Sequential Read Speed | New | "Used" |
| Intel X25-E | 240.1 MB/s | |
| Intel X25-M | 264.1 MB/s | 230.2 MB/s |
| JMicron JMF602B MLC | 134.7 MB/s | 134.7 MB/s |
| JMicron JMF602Bx2 MLC | 164.1 MB/s | 164.1 MB/s |
| OCZ Summit | 248.6 MB/s | 208.6 MB/s |
| OCZ Vertex | 257.8 MB/s | 250.1 MB/s |
| Samsung SLC | 101.4 MB/s | |
| Seagate Momentus 5400.6 | 77.9 MB/s | - |
| Western Digital Caviar SE16 | 104.6 MB/s | 54.3 MB/s |
| Western Digital VelociRaptor | 118.0 MB/s | 79.2 MB/s |
The best SSDs still transfer data at over 2x the rate of the VelociRaptor.
Read latency is also extremely good on these worn SSDs:
I left the conventional hard drives out of the chart simply because they completely screw up the scale. The VelociRaptor has a latency of 7.2ms in this iometer test with a queue depth of 3 IOs; that's an order of magnitude slower than the slowest SSD here.
Since you only pay the overhead penalty when you go to write to a previously-written block, the performance degradation only really occurs when you’re writing - not when you’re reading.
Now your OS is always writing to your drive, and that’s why we see a performance impact even if you’re just launching applications and opening files and such, but the penalty is much less tangible when it comes to read performance.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
250 Comments
View All Comments
GlItCh017 - Wednesday, March 18, 2009 - link
I just wanted to comment that the backstory portion to this article is simply the most interesting part to an article (or almost even an article inside the main article). On top of that, it is easily the most interesting article I have ever read simply because of that section. Really really must say that I enjoyed reading it!radguy - Wednesday, March 18, 2009 - link
I have been waiting for this one for a while and it was very informative. Thank you very much for it. I did pick up one of the patriot warp drives for my netbook. I was really happy until I installed avg free. So not running an antivirus on it anymore but I have drive image backup incase it goes bad. Overall pretty happy as it was only 80 bucks if I get my mir.I think I'm going to wait until windows 7 till I upgrade my primary desktop. 2 of those vertexs in raid 0 would be sweet though.
sleepeeg3 - Wednesday, March 18, 2009 - link
They were one of the first SSDs you reviewed and they use their own controller. How does their random write performance compare to everything else out now?These reviews made me totally reassess the purchase of the two Samsungs I bought. I had no idea the random writes on the Samsung drives were so bad. Other reviews show the Samsung drives doing better or at least near the X25-M in write tests: http://www.techreport.com/articles.x/15433/6">http://www.techreport.com/articles.x/15433/6 However, those tests probably would have been somewhat sequential.
nubie - Wednesday, March 18, 2009 - link
Grammatically awkward sentence on Page 21:"so if you own one of these drives - you owned a fixed version."
The tense is incorrect (own/owned). I think "own a fixed version" is still awkward, perhaps "you have the fixed version", also the "so" may be superfluous. You can replace the ", so if" with a "; if". Here is how I might re-write the sentence:
"The old firmware never shipped thanks to OCZ's quick acting; if you own one of these drives - you have a fixed version."
(I am not an expert, so feel free to correct me if I am wrong.)
Awesome article btw, thanks for setting me straight on SSD, I have been steering clear of them. I hope soon you can review SSD's and most are good to excellent. :)
Flyboy27 - Wednesday, March 18, 2009 - link
This article has answered every question I've had regarding SSDs recently. Thanks Anand!Flyboy27 - Wednesday, March 18, 2009 - link
If a 120gb Vertex was around $250 I would get one yesterday. I suppose I can wait though.7Enigma - Thursday, March 19, 2009 - link
For me, 2 60's or 2 80's for around that price and I'm sold. Want the Raid0.kgwagner - Wednesday, March 18, 2009 - link
I almost didn't read this article, as everybody and their brother seems to want to explain SSDs these days and most of the articles aren't much more than glorified press releases. But, this one truly took the drives to task and presented some valid information and explanations about the state of the art and where it needs to go. Kudos, Anand. Awesome show. Good job.Mr Perfect - Wednesday, March 18, 2009 - link
"Needless to say, there was some definite fallout from that review. I’m used to negative manufacturer response after a GPU review, but I’m always a bit surprised when it happens in any other segment."Obviously you can't make a business out of irritating manufacturers, but when there really are issues, the readers want to know about them. After all, that's why we come here!
gwolfman - Wednesday, March 18, 2009 - link
You own Anand. Keep up the good work. I've seen you cited from many sites about the work you've done, in particular with SSDs. Best article I've read in months!