ATI Radeon HD 4890 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

294 Comments

View All Comments

• lk7900 - Monday, April 27, 2009 - link

  
  Can you please die? Prefearbly by getting crushed to death, or by getting your face cut to shreds with a
  pocketknife.
  
  I hope that you get curb-stomped, f ucking retard
  
  Shut the *beep* up f aggot, before you get your face bashed in and cut
  to ribbons, and your throat slit.
  
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGt3lpxyo1U">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGt3lpxyo1U
  
  I wish you a truly painful, bloody, gory, and agonizing death, *beep*
  

• Veteran - Thursday, April 2, 2009 - link

  BTW. 4890 is not a rebadge or something, it is an improved core (check xbitlabs), it has 3M more pixels and about 22 sqmm more diesize

• Veteran - Thursday, April 2, 2009 - link

  pixels should be transistors offcourse.....

• GamerBad - Thursday, August 5, 2010 - link

  I am not sure what all the conversation here is about.
  I will tell you a bit my graphics card.
  First,
  I am an GeForce man through and through. I will tell you why.
  I have never purchased a GeForce card that was faulty. Luck?
  My current computer is running all Asus. Twin Ati Radeon 4890's ...
  and so far.. I am on my third replacement graphics card. The first one had memory problems. Second was doa... third.. well.. this one overheats and crashes.
  The Radeon may be better than the GeForce when it works. I really dont notice a difference.
  So to me.. it is quality of craftsmanship that makes the difference.
  Currently I am very unhappy with Radeon becuase I build my new system for this graphics setup. My Asus mother board dosent support dual GeForce only Radeon.
  It seems I am stuck sending my graphics cards back and praying eventually I will get one that is not a lemon.