AMD’s Radeon HD 5830: A Filler Card at the Wrong Price

148 Comments

View All Comments

• Ben90 - Thursday, February 25, 2010 - link

  I'm sorry, but your first two paragraphs is probably the stupidest thing I've read in a while. Ill admit a week isn't very much to fret over, but your post reads like: "AMD/Nvidia can launch whatever they want, whenever they want... If you don't like them releasing the HD 9870/GTX 626262 early just lose your job as a reviewer you baby"
  
  I'm glad you can write negative things in your reviews Ryan. I get tired of reading sites clearly sucking up because they got something free.

• bill4 - Thursday, February 25, 2010 - link

  First of all, this is like the flimsiest paper launch ever. He admits HES NOT EVEN SURE ITS A PAPER LAUNCH. But still complains.
  
  Second, again fuzzy memory, but I'm pretty sure SEVERAL recent AMD/Nvidia launches have been paper.
  
  Paper launches are good. The product will be available when it's available in either case. The only difference is, how soon you get the product info. The sooner the better imo.
  
  If a world exclusive GTX 470/480 review hit the web tomorrow, would you refuse to read it because it's a paper launch? Hell no, everything would be exactly as it is now, except you'd have more info sooner.

• Spoelie - Thursday, February 25, 2010 - link

  Paper launches are very bad because they are misleading, with no guarantee of the product actually making it too retail, or in the same configuration as the retail samples.
  
  Right until the chips are in boards and on their way to the retail store in sufficient quantities, too much can go wrong.
  
  I remember around the X800 vs 6800 era when paper launches were at their peak (X800XT, X800XTX, X800XTX PE -nicknamed press edition-, X850XT, ... all very marginal variations of the same card) there were also X700XT reviews all over the place (like here http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2214...">http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2214... ), but the card NEVER made it to retail. Which makes the review kinda pointless. There was a X700PRO though, small comfort.

• monomer - Thursday, February 25, 2010 - link

  It looks like the 5830's are hitting retail today, if NewEgg is to be believed. $239.99 for the Bare-bones Powercolor, and $264.99 for the Sapphire which comes with COD-MW2.
  
  http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N8...">http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N8...
  http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N8...">http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a...p;cm_re=...

• shiggz - Thursday, February 25, 2010 - link

  So basically its the same price, performance, TDP as my gtx 260 I bought a year ago?
  
  I will upgrade when I can buy the first video card by either company that fits these specs.
  
  - 20+% faster then 5870
  - 250-300$
  - 28nm
  - max 170 watt TDP
  - good fan no louder then my 260 (spend way more time reading then gaming)
  
  I might jump in the next 6-9 months If I see a 5890 with a good non-stock fan for 275$. I don't think Nvidia will have anything in terms of price, performance, TDP in my range any time soon.
  
  My money, My 260, and I can certainly wait longer then ATI or Nvidia can so well see who gets me first. :)

• Alouette Radeon - Wednesday, March 24, 2010 - link

  Your GTX 260 is on par with the HD 4870 and HD 5770. Where do you get the idea that a GTX 260 is a match to the HD 5830/4890? I call that wishful thinking at its best! LOL

• Paladin1211 - Thursday, February 25, 2010 - link

  Quote:
  
  "I might jump in the next 6-9 months If I see a 5890 with a good non-stock fan for 275$. I don't think Nvidia will have anything in terms of price, performance, TDP in my range any time soon."
  
  If Nvidia can't come out with anything in terms of price, performance, TDP in your range any time soon, what makes you think of a 5890 for $275? No less than $475 I would say, even at 28nm ^_^
  

• AznBoi36 - Thursday, February 25, 2010 - link

  You think you can get faster than 5870 performance with a low price and 28nm? Not to mention even 40nm yields are still pretty horrible.
  
  You're going to have to wait a lot longer than 9 months buddy. Try 2 years.

• shiggz - Thursday, February 25, 2010 - link

  I mentioned I may jump early 6-9 months from now for a good deal on a 5890. If not good deals happen I'll wait for next gen.
  
  This gen has already been delayed was planned to be released last summer/fall. Fermi2 is not 2 years away. Next gen development works in parallel not sequential. Just because this gen was late doesn't mean next gen will be. Reports from Global foundries and TSMC are that 28nm is developing well and on schedule for end of this year.

• coldpower27 - Thursday, February 25, 2010 - link

  Your gonna have to keep waiting then...