Gaming Performance - Jedi Knight 2
Due to a driver issue with the driver package IBM supplied us with on the ThinkPad
T40p, we were unable to get reliable numbers out of the system in Jedi Knight
2. We have seen the Radeon 9000, Mobility Radeon 9000, and Radeon 9000 Pro run
just fine in Jedi Knight 2 so the error is likely a result of an early driver
drop given to IBM my ATI. Let's hope a driver fix is out before the IBM T40p
begins shipping in mass quantities.
Jedi
Knight 2 Performance
800x600x32 |
Desktop
Pentium 4 (2.4GHz GF4 Ti 4200)
Dell D800 (1.6GHz GF4 4200 Go)
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
28 |
|
56 |
|
84 |
|
112 |
|
140 |
|
17 |
|
|
|
Just to give you an idea of how the GeForce4 4200 Go performs in relation to
the desktop GeForce4 Ti 4200, we made graphs of these two products. At 800x600x32
you can see that the two solutions perform identically. This is because at low
resolutions such as 800x600x32, Jedi Knight 2 is CPU limited.
Jedi
Knight 2 Performance
1024x768x32 |
Desktop
Pentium 4 (2.4GHz GF4 Ti 4200)
Dell D800 (1.6GHz GF4 4200 Go)
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
28 |
|
56 |
|
83 |
|
111 |
|
139 |
|
17 |
|
|
|
Bumping the resolution up to 1024x768x32 shows a gap between the desktop 4200
product and the mobile one. The desktop card performs 13% faster than the mobile
one.
Jedi
Knight 2 Performance
1280x1024x32 |
Desktop
Pentium 4 (2.4GHz GF4 Ti 4200)
Dell D800 (1.6GHz GF4 4200 Go)
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
27 |
|
53 |
|
80 |
|
107 |
|
133 |
|
16 |
|
|
|
Finally, at 1280x1024x32, the performance gap jumps to 45%. Note how the performance
of the desktop system has changed very little since the initial test at 800x600x32,
indicating that the game is not video card limited on the desktop side even
at 1280x1024x32.
139.8
137.2
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
3 Comments
View All Comments
builda - Thursday, February 2, 2006 - link
There appears to be a wide spread fault with the Gigabyte NB-1401 model notebook, where it reports having system disk errors or cannot find the hard disk. We have 7 of this model notebook and now 6 of them have reported the same problem. After running chkdsk to temporarily repair the errors that had been caused on the harddisk I found the problem returned the escalated to the point the harddisk could not be found. I further checked using Hitachi drive fitness testing tool which reported a cable error on each machine. Originally I returned 3 of these for repair as they were just outside the warranty period and the supplier checked with Gigabyte with the fix being to rub the cable all over with an eraser!! This worked for a short period but the problem has returned a couple of months later and has spread (like a virus) it now affects 6 out of the 7 notebooks. The supplier has just gone into administration and my next step is to approach Gigabyte who's support service has been found to be extremely unresponsive in the recent past.dbiberdorf - Tuesday, July 27, 2004 - link
I beg to differ with the reviewer. The keyboard on this unit is mediocre, and the track stick buttons are an abomination. They sit too low in the case and have too much travel. It makes my thumbs hurt after a while, and I often have to press them with a finger to get them to activate fully.The most powerful notebook in the world loses big points in my book if they built-in keyboard and pointing devices are weak. Certainly it's the case here. Dell, please figure out how to buy good keyboards for your machines!
Finally, the power adapter, while featuring convienent wrap-around cabling, is phenomenally large. My cordless phone at home is smaller. With the large profile of the machine, the adapter has to go in a side pocket of the carrying case, adding a little more bulge to your day.
visibilityunlimited - Thursday, October 30, 2003 - link
Screen resolution beyond SXGA+ would be unreadable using Windows for example while being more readable using Linux.Both the Linux text console and graphics mode X-windows-system screen drivers can be fully customized to display text at any resolution. The text characters could easily be displayed with current software at 1200dpi or more (if only the graphics processors and monitors could operate at that speed) and still retain the current character size. Text can currently be generated from vector based Type I and TrueType fonts for rasterizing at any resolution. Image scaling is a different and very easy problem.
The Windows OS is the real culprit holding back general usage of higher resolutions and typeset quality displays because of the OS being handicapped by the inertia of antique display modes. Darn. I want 3200x2400 or more!