Sweet Nectar…
 |
Members of the Mantel force are suited up in full body armor trimmed in bright yellow and wear helmets with shiny yellow face shields that give the appearance of giant bumblebees. No doubt the game's developers saw the irony between the soldiers' appearance and the drug, Nectar. The Nectar used by Mantel is contained in packs worn on the soldiers' backs and is injected intravenously into the back of their necks. In the game, players are given a tutorial on the use of Nectar, instructing how to give your character a shot, or boost, of the drug. While the drug is continuously administered into the blood stream, a boost of it will fill the Nectar bar in the game's HUD.
Boosts of Nectar allow the player to move faster, take less damage, and view enemies much easier as they emit an orange glow. This works like night vision or infrared goggles, but affects enemies only. Each of the six Nectar boosts you can carry at once deplete over the course of a minute or so when used. However, each kill you make before your indictor bar drains completely refills it a little. With that in mind, it's entirely possible to keep a single boost going until the an is cleared of enemies. While these are welcome enhancements, the use of Nectar is not without its negative effects.
 |
Like most drugs, Nectar comes with a disclaimer. Here's ours.
While using Nectar, do not overfill the capacity of your Nectar bar. Overdoses of Nectar may cause the inability to distinguish your enemies from your own squad. Most common side effects found in those who use Nectar include, but are not limited to, hysteria, dizziness, blurred vision, extreme paranoia, hallucinating, temporary deafness, or spontaneously bursting into flames. Those suffering from the most extreme side effects should consult a physician immediately, or simply run and hide while shaking your Sixaxis controller vigilantly.
Soldiers who have overdosed are recognized by their bright red face shields, erratic behavior, and red clouds of Nectar that leak from the containers on the soldiers' backs. The drug is also used as a brainwashing agent. Unlike Haley Joel Osment in The Sixth Sense, Mantel soldiers cannot see dead people. This of course is to protect them from the realities of the war at hand.
While the use of Nectar appears to be the star of this show, disappointment inevitably comes when players no longer have the ability to use it after the first couple of hours into the game. At this point, you learn that Mantel's real agenda is not so desirable, thus causing your character to switch sides and begin fighting alongside the members of The Promised Hand. With this turn of events come a few new abilities, such as swiftly dodging enemy fire and feigning death. While playing dead, Mantel's troopers cannot see you, which is odd since you're not actually dead. It is a welcome feature nonetheless and one that you'll use to your advantage from time to time.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
28 Comments
View All Comments
Choppedliver - Thursday, May 29, 2008 - link
Ive been reading this site from the start too. Its like my morning cup of coffee and my evening beer.Give them a damn break. Hardware, games, etc, this is anand TECH. Tech is a lot of things. It's a progression of the site. As long as they do a good job of the review, I don't give a crap what they review. Its not taking away from other stuff, like he said, and I honestly would rather believe a game review from this site than some of the "dedicated" game sites.
I like many tech geeks, like pc hardware, cameras, games and a number of TECH things. If I can get my reviews here rather than go to another site, well that's just fine with me.
Just like with anything else, if you don't like it, click on something you do like. You people act like by giving you additional content they have caused you some irreparable harm. Read what you want, dont read the rest. How F***ing hard is that?
AcydRaine - Friday, May 30, 2008 - link
Totally with you on that. If you do not want to read the articles, then don't. Not very hard. I do it every day on every website I frequent, and that is quite a few. Not just TECH sites either.Good to read actual users that enjoy playing games giving an unbiased opinion on their experiences with a game that doesn't come from how much money they were payed to give the review, or how much advertisment for the game they took on. Great article Eddie.
EddieTurner - Tuesday, May 27, 2008 - link
Allow me to address some of the concerns here. For the most part, the hardware that AT has fcused on for so long can be only utilized to its fullest extent with today's games, which is why Anand would like to see more game related articles. And since AT has spread its wings into numerous areas of tech-related subjects, including console gaming, it is only fitting that all aspects of gaming, regardless of platform, have a presence on the site.We know that many of you are die hard PC gamers, and we aim to bring you up to speed on some of the most talked about PC titles on the market. But we also have a console gaming forum that stays just as active as the PC gaming forum, and that says a lot about our community. And with console game sales far outnumbering their PC counterparts, that says alot about gaming in general. Today's hard core gamers play on consoles just as they do PC's. As for myself, I own a halfway decent rig, an Xbox 360, and a PS3. I'm not alone in this respect. And since great games are not limited so a single platform, our articles about them shouldn't be either. I'm here to talk games. The bar's open!
GoodRevrnd - Wednesday, May 28, 2008 - link
I understand wanting to expand the sites appeal, but game reviews are an absurdly flooded market. I really think for it to be worthwhile you need to carve out a niche. AT is a pretty technical site, so I think looking at games heavily from the hardware side like Jarred said is definitely a good idea (this is probably harder to do for console titles, I'll give you that). In detail, what new whiz-bangedness does this game really bring to the table in terms of graphics, physics, AI, etc. AT has always done this for the major engine releases like Source, UT, Crytek etc. but it might be interesting to see what technical evolutions individual games bring to the market. This is obviously pretty dry, but it's one take you could do to differentiate yourselves.One thing I'd kind of like from a game reviewer is more technical analysis of gameplay. We get these wishy washy sweeping big picture articles from sites like Gamespy/IGN/Gamespot that don't really leave you much more informed than you were from the previous 6 months of hype and previews before the game came out. I'm reminded of older Adrenaline Vault articles. They really got into the nitty gritty mechanics of a game and evaluated game design elements. The down side was they just weren't able to keep up with the larger sites in delivering content. Basically it boils down to Summary = Bad.
tangsta - Tuesday, May 27, 2008 - link
I appreciate the fact that Anandtech is doing game reviews. Right next to video cards and lcds, games are interesting to me. To me, this site gave the most informative, practical, and accurate review of GTA4. I don't ever feel a "biased vibe" from Anandtech, like I do from most gaming-review sites. Those sites always seem to be searching for a dramatic spin on things.I don't know if I'm going to try Haze yet, but so far, I feel that this review is the most informative.
geogaddi - Tuesday, May 27, 2008 - link
reticule, reticle. redact, or ridicule!
but it's a great premise for a hard-core, twitch-action, first-person shooter - using a high-performance weapon from dolce & gabanna to slay evildoers.
accessorize THIS, biyatch...
the goat - Tuesday, May 27, 2008 - link
You didn't answer the most important question. Does the game support USB keyboard and mouse for control?Genx87 - Tuesday, May 27, 2008 - link
I think after this generation will come to an end. It seems most of them were with the PS3 and the devs watch as their exclusives get beat in sales by COD4 on the 360 that has been out for 4 months.Good riddance imo.
sweetsauce - Tuesday, May 27, 2008 - link
unless you plan on hyping up the ps3. The fanboys don't like negative reviews. How dare you put down their beloved system, and make it worse by pointing out that a mediocre game is exclusive!On a serious note, I enjoyed the review myself. Seems like you can't trust other gaming sites anymore. If you can manage to stay unbiased, and im hoping your pc roots will allow that, then game reviews would be a welcome addition to a great website.
Tavoc - Tuesday, May 27, 2008 - link
I've been reading Anandtech since the late 90s when Anand was still a high school student in Raleigh NC (as was I). I came to the site first because my dad pointed out a article about Anand in the local newspaper, but I stayed for the high quality computer hardware reviews and analysis. At the time there were few sites on the net that had the same quantity and quality of hardware reviews as Anandtech.In the past year or so, it appears that the site is really losing focus on what brought people here in the first place, careful and rigorous analysis of a multitude of computer hardware products. I really don't see a point in adding a couple of random console game reviews (rock band and Haze) when Anandtech is losing its edge in deep hardware reviews to places like HardOCP and in quantity to places like Toms Hardware. I also don't see the point in offering digital camera reviews when the frequency and quality doesn't exceed existing leaders in the subject (dpreview.com).
I think its great that the editorial staff seems to be given free reign to write articles about whatever they feel like (Digital cameras, console game reviews, random USB Hubs etc.), but they are really spreading themselves too thin given the relative lack of computer hardware articles. Just look at the number of tabs at the top of the page, and then look at the frequency with which each is updated. The "Linux" (last updated in 2005), "IT Computing", "Displays", and "Mac" categories should probably be discontinued if there isn't sufficient staff to keep updated on a more than monthly basis.
Its not even the lack of hardware articles that bothers me so much more than the fact that the ones that do get released do not follow a consistent methodology over time, do not have enough depth (average FPS numbers from timedemos?) and no longer lead the way in quality.
I guess the bottom line is that I think Anandtech should focus on what used to be their core-competency; in depth, industry leading computer hardware reviews. Additional subjects and areas of focus should only be added when and if there is sufficient bandwidth to maintain quantity and quality in the core computer hardware areas.